Partisan gerrymandering (where the controlling political party redraws voting district lines to keep itself in power and disenfranchise voters of the other party) is an emerging hot topic in Pennsylvania and Federal appellate courts. Pennsylvania Appellate Advocate’s new weekly series, LWV v. PA: Gerrymandering and the Battle Over Voting District Design, explores the current status of the litigation, the legal history of political gerrymandering, and provides updates as the litigation makes its way through the courts.
In our first installment, we provide an overview of LWV v. PA and preview the history and status of voting district design in Pennsylvania.
In this second part of our series, we discuss the issue of justiciability as it relates to the issue of gerrymandering.
In this Part 3 of our series, we explain the current procedural status of LWV v. PA, and explore the arguments related to the General Assembly’s request to stay.
In this forth installment in our series, we provide in-depth analysis on the oral argument before the Commonwealth Court on the General Assembly’s request for stay.
In Part 5, we provide and update and analysis on the court’s grant of the General Assembly’s request for stay.
In this fifth installment, we provide on update on the Supreme Court’s grant of extraordinary relief and subsequent Commonwealth Court orders.
In Part 7, we provide an update on the litigation, and analyze the expert reports offered, in pending Pennsylvania gerrymandering cases.
In Part 7, we discuss Senator Scarnati’s failed attempt to remove the case to federal court.
About the Author:
Whitney Snyder, attorney at Hawke, McKeon & Sniscak, LLP, represents clients in wide-ranging appellate matters in state and federal court. Her practice focuses primarily on administrative agency appeals and litigation. Prior to joining the firm Whitney interned at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.